Every year, the debate over whether the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 were justified resurfaces. Recent articles published by The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal present contrasting views on the issue. A former Los Alamos laboratory official argues that the bombings saved millions of lives, while a story about Maj. Claude Eatherly highlights the moral dilemma faced by those involved. The author challenges some common myths about Hiroshima, including the idea that it was a military base and the belief that unconditional surrender was the only option. The article also examines the legality of the bombings, concluding that such an attack would be illegal today. This raises concerns about the potential misuse of nuclear weapons in the future and emphasizes the importance of knowledgeable leaders who prioritize law and justice in war.
https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/hiroshima-and-myths-military-targets-and-unconditional-surrender